Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Alexander Berntsen <bernalex@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Autounmask changes
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:07:07
Message-Id: 53EB8D23.20208@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Autounmask changes by Alexander Berntsen
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 Evidently MichaƂ was a bit sceptical. And anyway, I don't care too
5 much about these patches any longer. Maybe it comes with raising in
6 the ranks, but 2014 me is not particularly sympathetic of 2013 me and
7 his stupid patches. These days I just prefer fixing bugs and not
8 changing anything.
9
10 So on that note, if nobody objects, I suggest we just ignore the
11 autounmask refactor altogether. Instead I'll just make the actual
12 bugfix (make --ask imply --autounmask-write) a standalone patch which
13 I'll submit to the list. Sounds good to everyone?
14 - --
15 Alexander
16 bernalex@g.o
17 https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
18 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
19 Version: GnuPG v2
20 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
21
22 iF4EAREIAAYFAlPrjSMACgkQRtClrXBQc7UbzgD+IrQtwow8PvZrRYJMGOc/RfgR
23 DtkIncGKQ75uHYEiQQcA/iYUsRLgVgYYm11DI6QIu0DQi1NGZNJ61/sB7WrICQz+
24 =ARIp
25 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Autounmask changes Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o>