1 |
Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 04:55:09PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote: |
3 |
> > Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 07:42:23PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: |
5 |
> > > > Was just brought to my attention that the =* operator doesn't |
6 |
> > > > work as I thought, as for example =foo-1.2* matches foo-1.20 as |
7 |
> > > > well as foo-1.2.3. |
8 |
> > <snip> |
9 |
> > > > but I'd suspect that many people share my original assumption |
10 |
> > > > and expect it to only match full version components |
11 |
> > > |
12 |
> > > Hear a bit of screaming from it once every 4-6 months; personally, |
13 |
> > > I interpret that as devs know which to use usually- additionally, |
14 |
> > > once the (bluntly) hissy fit from the dev subsides, and they're |
15 |
> > > reminded "yes it's annoying, but if you want it changed take it to |
16 |
> > > dev to get consensus" folks promptly forget about it. |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > You mean a consensus on -dev like the one regarding the Sunrise |
19 |
> > project? |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > > Either they're silently working around it, or it's not that much |
22 |
> > > of an issue (I suspect the latter, but am neutral towards the |
23 |
> > > change). |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> > Or ignoring it because it's not worth the heartache. Or they feel it |
26 |
> > to be more likely that their input will be rejected by devs who just |
27 |
> > don't feel like working on it, but also don't want their babies |
28 |
> > touched by foreign hands. See Bug #69343 and everything marked as a |
29 |
> > dupe against it for a fine example of that mentality. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> Either you're trolling, or your whinging (bluntly). |
32 |
|
33 |
Mostly trolling, but it's a valid point. The technical issue is not |
34 |
nearly as daunting as the political one. |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
There are problems in today's world that cannot be |
38 |
solved by the level of thinking that created them. |
39 |
-- Albert Einstein |