Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Elfyn McBratney <beu@×××.org>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Running commands after a merge (via /etc/portage/package.hooks)
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 10:31:28
Message-Id: 200409241051.34095.beu@gnu.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Running commands after a merge (via /etc/portage/package.hooks) by Colin Kingsley
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Hey Colin,
5
6 On Thursday 23 Sep 2004 03:56, Colin Kingsley wrote:
7 > Ths sounds usefull, but similar to package.cflags and a few other
8 > things,
9
10 Except, this isn't exactly a build time thing.. if package.cflags (hmm) went
11 wrong/bad/whatever, you might get a broken updated 'thing', due to build
12 errors. Ehm, anyway.. wrong, wrong, place for it, imo. ;-)
13
14 > probably takes alot of work to implement and doesnt benefit
15 > enough users to justify it.
16
17 Not much work, ~50 lines now and sorta working. :-)
18
19 > But if I'm wrong, then awesome, this sounds cool.
20
21 Well, one way it sits on my space and a few use it, other way it goes into
22 portage and maybe a few more use it and benefit from it. Who knows...
23
24 :-)
25
26 Elfyn
27
28 - --
29 Elfyn McBratney
30 beu on irc.freenode.net/savannah.[non]gnu.org
31
32 PGP Key ID: 0x456548B4
33 PGP Key Fingerprint:
34 29D5 91BB 8748 7CC9 650F 31FE 6888 0C2A 4565 48B4
35 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
36 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
37
38 iD8DBQFBU+4jaIgMKkVlSLQRAniLAKCRxye26oaXD1uTemLx4d1iLr6lAACePD4F
39 NPj8yYb9kmL/cd+LBRLxNtQ=
40 =MvnD
41 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
42
43 --
44 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list