| 1 |
On Saturday 29 November 2003 13:28, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Saturday 29 November 2003 12:47, Daniel Robbins wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Hi All, |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Attach is a much-improved portage-ng requirements doc (about 7x more |
| 6 |
> > verbose than the previous one...) |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Would a list of required functionality (without any implementation details) |
| 9 |
> be part of this document as well? It seems to me that such information |
| 10 |
> would be useful at the commencement of the design phase. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I've taken the liberty of writing up all the requests for basic functionility |
| 13 |
that I can think of and put it into the attached file. I haven't completed |
| 14 |
the "enterprise/cluster management" section yet as it's far past bed-time. I |
| 15 |
ask that others can comment and expand/revise this document, after which it |
| 16 |
can enhance the brief second paragraph of Daniel's system-spec. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
In light of the architectural requirements, I attempted to write functional |
| 19 |
requirements that aren't tied to any other piece of functionality. While I |
| 20 |
haven't stated it in the document, the intention is to make it easier to |
| 21 |
descern points of separation of functional components when it comes time to |
| 22 |
actually do the design - yeah I know, jumping the gun. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Anyway, constructive comments are always appreciated. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Regards, |
| 27 |
Jason Stubbs |
Archives