| 1 |
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 14:49 -0500, Paul Varner wrote: |
| 2 |
> Just a reminder that due to the changes in portage-2.1, that it breaks |
| 3 |
> gentoolkit-0.2.1 which is the current stable version. I have placed |
| 4 |
> gentoolkit-0.2.2 in the tree which works with portage-2.1 and opened bug |
| 5 |
> #135068 <http://bugs.gentoo.org/135068> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I have not added the arch teams to the bug since it has obviously not |
| 8 |
> been in the tree for thirty days. I will add the arch teams at that |
| 9 |
> time. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Things can be fast tracked if it's better for the overall health of the |
| 12 |
tree. The 30 thing is just a general guideline and more so before we |
| 13 |
had any arch teams/ATs/etc... Now that we have arch teams the QA/stable |
| 14 |
process has been highly improved. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> If portage-2.1 is requested to be marked stable before then, we need to |
| 17 |
> also make the same request for gentoolkit, so that we don't break it. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Regards, |
| 20 |
> Paul |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 23 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives