| 1 |
Brian Harring wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 01:54:06PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>Brian Harring wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>>So... thoughts? I'm not much for making portage depend on tarsync |
| 7 |
>>>just for emerge-webrsync improvements, would rather chunk the bugger |
| 8 |
>>>out. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>>How about runtime detection? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> runtime detection is questionable from my standpoint, since while |
| 13 |
> coding for it is good, without hard dep pulling it in the only folks |
| 14 |
> who will ever have a faster emerge-webrsync are those who happen to |
| 15 |
> know the hidden trick to merge tarsync. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Well, how do you plan to inform users of the splitted package for |
| 18 |
webrsync? Could just do the same for tarsync instead, or for example if |
| 19 |
no tarsync is found print a nice little message about "falling back to |
| 20 |
slow default, emerge tarsync to avoid". |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Marius |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives