Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o, "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Subject: Re: [RFC] gpkg format proposal v2 (was: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] Improving Gentoo package format)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 17:53:54
Message-Id: 483c044c-334f-7d08-3116-fbdf3425ea42@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [RFC] gpkg format proposal v2 (was: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] Improving Gentoo package format) by Zac Medico
1 On 11/13/18 9:49 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
2 > On 11/11/18 12:53 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
3 >> Hi,
4 >>
5 >> Ok, here's the second version integrating the feedback received.
6 >> The format is much simpler, based on nested tarballs inspired by Debian.
7 >>
8 >> The outer tarball is uncompressed and uses '.gpkg.tar' suffix. It
9 >> contains (preferably in order but PM should also handle packages with
10 >> mismatched order):
11 >>
12 >> 1. Optional (but recommended) "gpkg: ${PF}" package label that can be
13 >> used to quickly distinguish Gentoo binpkgs from regular tarballs
14 >> (for file(1)).
15 >>
16 >> 2. "metadata.tar${comp}" tarball containing binary package metadata
17 >> as files.
18 >>
19 >> 3. Optional "metadata.tar${comp}.sig" containing detached signature
20 >> for the metadata archive.
21 >>
22 >> 4. "contents.tar${comp}" tarball containing files to be installed.
23 >>
24 >> 5. Optional "contents.tar${comp}.sig" containing detached signature for
25 >> the contents archive.
26 >
27 > We'll want to access "contents.tar${comp}.sig" very early, but in the
28 > absence of an index containing offsets, normally we'd have to read all
29 > of "contents.tar${comp}" first. However, I suppose we could search
30 > backwards for the "contents.tar${comp}.sig" entry.
31
32 We could solve this problem by adding an index file containing offsets
33 as the last file in the outer tar file.
34 --
35 Thanks,
36 Zac

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies