Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Vote to revert all changes related to shallow git fetch from bug 552814
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 20:28:45
Message-Id: 20161107122837.001ed68e.dolsen@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-portage-dev] Vote to revert all changes related to shallow git fetch from bug 552814 by Zac Medico
1 On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 11:26:06 -0800
2 Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > Given the performance issues introduced by `git update-index` and `git
5 > prune`, shallow fetch doesn't seem to be a practical default at this
6 > time.
7 >
8 > In order to prepare a release that will be eligible for
9 > stabilization, I propose that we revert all of the changes related to
10 > bug 552814:
11 >
12 > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=84413bb1dd9df322568ce25efc5b7854a43d03c7
13 > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=55aef9bf297ef8cbf29921acb454449d01313818
14 > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=f5d258656de3db54af06fbca9b8da5217d3802f4
15 > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=f77fcd6b0b4ebb49ca62f5767cd5c931127c3dbb
16 > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=d075422a8902617833ec945d94beb0bb334d44c9
17 >
18
19 Yeah, this will be best, go for it.
20
21 --
22 Brian Dolbec <dolsen>

Replies