| 1 |
On 11/13/2015 12:12 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 |
>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> On 11/12/2015 04:06 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> from ebuilds/eclasses that have already stopped using __: |
| 6 |
>>> __do_sed_fix () |
| 7 |
>>> ___ECLASS_RECUR_MULTILIB=yes |
| 8 |
>>> ___ECLASS_RECUR_TOOLCHAIN_FUNCS=yes |
| 9 |
>>> __versionator_shopt_toggle () |
| 10 |
>>> __versionator__test_version_compare () |
| 11 |
>>> __versionator__test_version_is_at_least () |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>>> grepping the tree, i see like two packages and one eclass still using __. |
| 14 |
>>> both of which are trivial to convert. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
>> Sure, but do we really want to confuse people who might be ignorant of |
| 17 |
>> this rule? Having functions disappear from the environment without |
| 18 |
>> warning is very likely to cause confusion... |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Maybe repoman should make people aware of this rule then? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Ulrich |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Yeah, that would be great. I'm a little more concerned about non-gentoo |
| 26 |
people that don't necessarily run repoman, though. At my workplace, we |
| 27 |
don't use repoman because it has too many checks that we don't care |
| 28 |
about. We really need to make it more configurable for third-party users. |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Thanks, |
| 31 |
Zac |
Archives