| 1 |
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 12:01:12AM +0200, Bastian Balthazar Bux wrote: |
| 2 |
> Sorry, but here the results are not those expected: |
| 3 |
.51.22 vs .53_rc5... try with a vanilla .53_rc5 please |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> ==== time emerge --metadata; 1st run; 2.0.51.22-r3 |
| 7 |
> real 2m24.419s |
| 8 |
> user 0m12.329s |
| 9 |
> sys 0m3.644s |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> ==== time emerge --metadata; 2nd run; 2.0.51.22-r3 |
| 12 |
> real 1m17.700s |
| 13 |
> user 0m12.257s |
| 14 |
> sys 0m2.976s |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> ==== time emerge --metadata; 1st run; 2.0.53_rc5 patched |
| 17 |
> real 3m14.073s |
| 18 |
> user 0m12.917s |
| 19 |
> sys 0m9.433s |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> ==== time emerge --metadata; 2nd run; 2.0.53_rc5 patched |
| 22 |
> real 3m42.874s |
| 23 |
> user 0m12.869s |
| 24 |
> sys 0m9.333s |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Wasn't expecting a massive improvement, although wasn't sure as hell |
| 27 |
wasn't expecting a 3x increase in sys. :) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Should've seen a large tweak for the first .53_rc5 run also, since it |
| 30 |
(essentially) would be a forced rewrite of the cache due to INHERITED |
| 31 |
vs _eclasses_ key changes (moving eclass_cache into the backend). |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Not running anything additional via /etc/portage/modules I'd bet, but |
| 34 |
asking to verify also... |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Meanwhile, thanks for testing; contrary to other results, but _any_ |
| 37 |
regression I'm after. |
| 38 |
~harring |
Archives