Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] grabfile_package: support -* in profile "packages" files (bug 610670)
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:36:57
Message-Id: cb9dd209-8ce4-bbec-101d-788805730a4d@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] grabfile_package: support -* in profile "packages" files (bug 610670) by Brian Dolbec
1 On 02/23/2017 07:52 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
2 > On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 11:53:15 +0000
3 > Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@××××××××.com> wrote:
4 >
5 >> On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 02:52 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
6 >>> Support -* in order to make it easier to create profiles for
7 >>> minimal systems (especially those built entirely from binary
8 >>> packages).
9 >>
10 >> Would be nice, but I don't get what the "packages" file is?
11 >
12 >
13 > That would be the 'packages' file (list of required packages)that are
14 > required for that specific profile. This patch would allow to
15 > override that packages file to build an image that only contained the
16 > minimum runtime pkgs required to perform the tasks it is suppose to.
17 > The idea being you would not need gcc, automake, ... or even portage or
18 > possibly python. The built image could of course be considered more
19 > secure not having a compiler, etc... not to mention smaller.
20 >
21 >
22 > Zac, looks fine to me.
23
24 Thanks, merged:
25
26 https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=f4b0714010f1237280fd48dcb65989679917d20a
27 --
28 Thanks,
29 Zac