1 |
In all fairness, there haven't been that much incidents with Portage in |
2 |
the past under Zac's supervision, isn't it a bit overkill to |
3 |
bureaucratise the release model just after one incident? It appears to |
4 |
me that changes to Portage need to be considered very carefully, always, |
5 |
since it affects everyone. |
6 |
|
7 |
Thanks, |
8 |
Fabian |
9 |
|
10 |
On 05-10-2021 10:31:40 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
11 |
> Hi, everyone. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I've been thinking about this for some time already, and the recent |
14 |
> FILESDIR mess seems to confirm it: I'd like to start a more stable LTS |
15 |
> branch of Portage. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Roughly, the idea is that: |
18 |
> |
19 |
> - master becomes 3.1.x, and primary development happens there |
20 |
> |
21 |
> - 3.0.x becomes the LTS branch and only major bugfixes are backported |
22 |
> there |
23 |
> |
24 |
> As things settle down in the future, master would become 3.2.x, 3.1.x |
25 |
> would become LTS, 3.0.x will be discontinued and so on. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> WDYT? |
28 |
> |
29 |
> -- |
30 |
> Best regards, |
31 |
> Michał Górny |
32 |
> |
33 |
> |
34 |
> |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
Fabian Groffen |
38 |
Gentoo on a different level |