| 1 |
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 06:05:50PM +0100, Alexander Berntsen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 16/01/14 17:45, W. Trevor King wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I love Signed-off-by, but in all projects where I've seen it used |
| 4 |
> > it means the signer is agreeing to some form of a Developer's |
| 5 |
> > Certificate of Origin [1]. Without such a DCO, I think the usual |
| 6 |
> > commit author is sufficient. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I agree. However, it might be prudent to introduce a DCO. After all, |
| 9 |
> copyright is assigned to the Gentoo Foundation. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
If you add a DCO (and I'd certainly think that would be prudent if you |
| 12 |
require copyright assignment), then you probably don't need a separate |
| 13 |
Assisted-by. Anyone with enough co-authorship to matter will be using |
| 14 |
a Signed-off-by. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Cheers, |
| 17 |
Trevor |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). |
| 21 |
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy |
Archives