Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/3] INSTALL_MASK refurbishing resubmit

[Michał Górny]

W dniu pią, 16.03.2018 o godzinie 08∶11 +0000, użytkownik Joakim
Tjernlund napisał:
> On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 20:22 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here are three of four INSTALL_MASK updates I've sent long time ago
> > which were not really reviewed. The fourth patch added support
> > for repo-defined install-mask.conf and I'll do that separately.
> >
> > Those patches focus on smaller changes. What they change, in order:
> >
> > 1. Removes explicit file removal code for FEATURES=no*. Instead, those
> >    values are converted into additional INSTALL_MASK entries
> >    and handled directly via INSTALL_MASK processing.
> >
> > 2. Rework INSTALL_MASK to filter files while installing instead of
> >    pre-stripping them. In other words, before: INSTALL_MASK removes
> >    files from ${D} before merge. After: ${D} contains all the files,
> >    Portage just skip INSTALL_MASK-ed stuff, verbosely indicating that.
>
> Will this also remove corresponding split debug files?
> There would be little/no point in keeping debug syms if the binary has been
> MASKed
>

Nope. Add both paths to INSTALL_MASK. Expecting it to do implicit magic
is a very bad idea.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny