Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] depgraph: fix runtime package mask interaction with slot operator rebuilds (bug 612094)
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 19:39:00
Message-Id: CAMiTYSoxy74tjB2vsqdCfWHCnYk+RGQBOrsppQVOWo7b3LUJ4g@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] depgraph: fix runtime package mask interaction with slot operator rebuilds (bug 612094) by Brian Dolbec
1 On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 22:11:45 -0800
3 > Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote:
4 >
5 >> In some cases the backtracking runtime package mask can interact badly
6 >> with slot operator rebuilds, preventing a solution from being found.
7 >> This patch fixes the problem, which is demonstrated by the included
8 >> unit test.
9 >>
10 >> X-Gentoo-bug: 612094
11 >> X-Gentoo-bug-url: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=612094
12 >> ---
13 >> pym/_emerge/depgraph.py | 28 +++--
14 >> .../test_slot_operator_runtime_pkg_mask.py | 136
15 >> +++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 12
16 >
17 >
18 > yeah, looks fine
19 > --
20 > Brian Dolbec <dolsen>
21 >
22 >
23
24 Thanks, merged:
25
26 https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=c01f3fbd23def329eb1d1b0fc8f79959119a8a82
27 --
28 Thanks,
29 Zac