Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] RFC on a "slot" update command
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 15:57:07
Message-Id: 1067961449.12499.1.camel@ht.gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-portage-dev] RFC on a "slot" update command by Thomas de Grenier de Latour
1 On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 07:57, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
2 > I've suggested this portage feature some time ago:
3 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27965
4 >
5 > Taking the ruby package as an example, the update command could have
6 > been something like this:
7 > "slot dev-lang/ruby-1.8* dev-lang/ruby-1.8* 1.8"
8
9 This is needed. I've added this email to my "portage-fixes" folder,
10 which means we'll keep this issue in mind when designing the
11 architecture for portage-ng.
12
13 Regards,
14
15 Daniel

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature