1 |
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:33:51 +0000 (UTC) |
2 |
Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Could a number of folks familiar with both portage AND bash completion |
5 |
> help out the shell-tools herd (no specific maintainer specified in |
6 |
> metadata) with app-shell/gentoo-bashcomp bugs? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> It seems to have accumulated quite a number (13) of portage-completion |
9 |
> (and gentoolkit-completion) related bugs, including bug #424777 filed on |
10 |
> July 4th by jer, mentioning that it it breaks with make.conf in /etc/ |
11 |
> portage, which is kinda critical right about now. =:^( |
12 |
> |
13 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424777 |
14 |
> |
15 |
> And here's the list of all open bugs for it. As you can see if you look, |
16 |
> all or nearly all of the currently 13 open bugs are portage or gentoolkit |
17 |
> related, and it really looks like the package could use some help from |
18 |
> those who know those tools. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=app-shells%2Fgentoo-bashcomp |
21 |
> |
22 |
> (I said on the devlist thread I'd report bugs, but this one's been open |
23 |
> for over two months and is directly related to the make.conf move, so it's |
24 |
> a big one, simple fix proposed, but no actual fixes in-tree yet, plus |
25 |
> seeing all those others related to portage and gentoolkit, thus the |
26 |
> request here.) |
27 |
|
28 |
I was planning on working on this. I just need to get off my butt and find |
29 |
someone to give me write access to the overlay. |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
gcc-porting |
34 |
toolchain, wxwidgets we were never more here, expanse getting broader |
35 |
@ gentoo.org but bigger boats been done by less water |