| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
When submitting v2-patches, please submit them in-reply-to=the message |
| 5 |
ID of the original thread. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
The patch looks OK, but I don't recall us using the "OBSOLETE" phrase |
| 8 |
in any documentation. Does anybody know any phrase we should be using |
| 9 |
instead, and why we should be using that phrase instead? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Maybe we should pick a term ("OBSOLETE" is fine by me), and make it |
| 12 |
"official" for these situations in the future. |
| 13 |
- -- |
| 14 |
Alexander |
| 15 |
bernalex@g.o |
| 16 |
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander |
| 17 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 18 |
Version: GnuPG v2 |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXQuHFAAoJENQqWdRUGk8B74sP/3gMywA7AWshVzsyzEA2PRf2 |
| 21 |
LNaW0vb98zSq5DbRuqN5624i83g20wk2GHNm/8ZqS1yuTrjNmJ3XjXJriQwCIryL |
| 22 |
cJTvz0FxrOdGcmT7/SWTI3vT0P6yOA5s+rrNp8jBPqeDQFAcy8eZbTDa8A9KtWmZ |
| 23 |
w6ZQ+ht3mQqLt3VkADDbzqX5/w1szi8isQXkFFKUn4en54A9KQsmsFWRqKYNpUPK |
| 24 |
7HXSTHhvPtSyoYxjBxKVd+chbDHVFbIqVWuuJfoSro3RiKDnCjzxYjuqcP8mRxfp |
| 25 |
s9O0LCynAwWBrTQwBJd0FRPp5Y95vRENCP+18XnT4cI3S+2TdJAptW+MfZrAXKz/ |
| 26 |
9OKJfuwkdvpOqdNtpk0mmbe19CIiCEFiZXP+wC+8JtyuEE+gwfUJaPbz5MFNLqRo |
| 27 |
TLPHvjphrtmyvasa8ZxocB7mF9uCwZSaPbxf0jr80axvBcVZPREY/a15SbOJliZI |
| 28 |
mBzqxto1mX6idWONMLIhWwwwV0SMEkOTxl4Osh/De2FbnSW47rOQxJdXs0jXQXW/ |
| 29 |
KOlVX7h7PzQ7KqS9lDpHJsyRMseRPMq3BTfwW+pMs3qwKEDg2Ge4p1E8aGv7Bjj8 |
| 30 |
LoPvPuGV2Vy51ZzowMqHxQzYTXdnHq33TDI8M/1qaJaIdrhSsGbmcoJt2YQuXPkE |
| 31 |
d+6/eMbY0YERDJ6FTofe |
| 32 |
=eAJu |
| 33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives