Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] More >= atoms for autounmask USE changes (536392)
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 17:05:30
Message-Id: 20150118090507.3f518de9.dolsen@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] More >= atoms for autounmask USE changes (536392) by Zac Medico
1 On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 23:13:20 -0800
2 Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > When checking for packages that will be matched by an autounmask USE
5 > change, account for package visibility (masking), so that we can
6 > generate more >= atoms (as opposed to = atoms that only match very
7 > specific versions). Don't do this for keyword or mask changes, since
8 > that may cause undesired versions to be unmasked!
9 >
10 > X-Gentoo-Bug: 536392
11 > X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536392
12 > ---
13 > pym/_emerge/depgraph.py | 13 +++++++++++--
14 > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
15 >
16
17 looks good, merge please
18
19
20 --
21 Brian Dolbec <dolsen>