Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: "W. Trevor King" <wking@×××××××.us>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Initial fetch() refactoring
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 22:46:53
Message-Id: 20140119224644.GT29063@odin.tremily.us
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Initial fetch() refactoring by Sebastian Luther
1 On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 10:39:03PM +0100, Sebastian Luther wrote:
2 > Am 19.01.2014 04:07, schrieb W. Trevor King:
3 > > The patches aren't particularly well tested yet. I ran the test suite
4 > > and got some errors, but they seemed to be related to my non-root
5 > > invocation, and not due to these changes themselves. I thought I'd
6 > > post my work so far, before digging deeper into the test suite.
7 >
8 > Since I doubt there's currently any test or any way to write one,
9
10 I'm working on a pym/portage/tests/ebuild/test_fetch.py to exercise
11 the helpers. Will post in v3.
12
13 > I'd suggest to try and run emerge and analyze coverage with
14 > dev-python/coverage or a similar tool.
15
16 Also a good idea. I'll have to dust off my coverage notes ;).
17
18 Thanks,
19 Trevor
20
21 --
22 This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
23 For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature