| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Sunday 13 June 2004 11:17 am, Hasan Khalil wrote: |
| 5 |
> Perhaps using a mysql-based cache would give more benefits than meets |
| 6 |
> the eye? I'm thinking particularly about, if it were possible, keeping a |
| 7 |
> mysql-based cache on a central server on my LAN, and having all clients |
| 8 |
> use that rather than having to keep a cache on each and every one of |
| 9 |
> them. This would also speed up cache times on slower machines, assuming |
| 10 |
> the network is faster than local access (which is sometimes the case in |
| 11 |
> my environment). Just a thought. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
We have been testing this out. This would be a great addition.. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
http://oneofone.limitlessfx.com/phpwiki/index.php/temp/portage_db_mysql.py |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
- -- |
| 18 |
If God can't help you, how about Mr Coffee? |
| 19 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 20 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
iD8DBQFAzITzld4MRA3gEwYRAiEbAJ4+knjH4UhMrlaSbg/u2C1es/GS6ACfSfwJ |
| 23 |
2InlgOg+QX2Vg/8mD3kw3ZQ= |
| 24 |
=VJQT |
| 25 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives