| 1 |
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 00:23 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:00:07 -0500 Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> | > Why introduce a feature which is crippled? It would be almost as |
| 4 |
> | > easy to allow ebuilds to mess with their 'real' runtime dependency |
| 5 |
> | > value as appropriate rather than forcing an incorrect |
| 6 |
> | > auto-generated list onto everyone. |
| 7 |
> | |
| 8 |
> | Please go back to trolling on dev We are trying to get work done here |
| 9 |
> | and solve real problems. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> Sure. You're inventing some arbitrary problem which has no reflection |
| 13 |
> upon reality and then solving some other arbitrary problem which has no |
| 14 |
> reflection upon either reality or what you say you're solving. End |
| 15 |
> result is more unnecessary complexity, more unnecessary mess and, once |
| 16 |
> you realise your solution is inadequate, no doubt yet another |
| 17 |
> incomplete hack on top of that. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
thanks asshat |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 23 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives