Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] GWN -portage-2.1 announcement.

[Brian]

On Tue, 2006-13-06 at 02:38 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:18:44 -0700
> Brian <dol-sen@×××××.net> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2006-12-06 at 18:58 -0500, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> > > Brian wrote:
> > > > Did I understand it wrong or did they get this mixed up in the GWN
> > > > announcement:
> > > >
> > > > /etc/portage/package.unmask/kde, /etc/portage/package.unmask/xorg
> > > >
> > > > Shouldn't it be:
> > > >
> > > > /etc/portage/kde/package.*, /etc/portage/xorg/package.*
> > >
> > > You understood it wrong. /etc/portage/package.unmask/foo is correct.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andrew Gaffney
> >
> > Thanks.  I'm glad now I didn't have the time to add that to porthole
> > yet.  Might have been a quick fix anyway though.
>
> Haven't looked at porthole code, but if you use portage_util.grab* the
> fix is trivial (just add a recursive=1 parameter).
>
> Marius
>

Thanks.  If I recall we were using grab_file(). I need to re-work it, as
it currently treats it only as a file.  I'll have to bring up a dialog
showing the subfile options when someone wants to add a package to one
of the package.* directories.

I also just did a man portage and the man page did not appear to be
updated for this change.

-- 
Brian <dol-sen@×××××.net>

-- 
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list