Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Marius Mauch <genone@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] inital Manifest2 support
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 03:33:57
Message-Id: 20051116043302.05ae074a@sven.genone.homeip.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] inital Manifest2 support by Marius Mauch
1 On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 04:07:56 +0100
2 Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > Hey,
5 >
6 > IIRC we (=Gentoo as a whole) pretty much agreed to drop the digest
7 > files in favor of a extended Manifest format. Well, today I wrote some
8 > initial code for this new format, you can find the result in the
9 > attachment. It's far from complete, but most basic stuff seems to work
10 > with some restrictions:
11 > - `ebuild foo digest` works if you have all SRC_URI files for the
12 > package (= all ebuilds of that package), however it will not verify
13 > the Manifest before overwriting it. Also it currently won't create
14 > the old digests (digestgen is a bit nasty).
15 > - `emerge foo` should also work (thankfully the parsing could be
16 > implemented in a simple compat layer)
17 > - repoman will likely have problems (didn't touch it yet)
18 > - I didn't add al the fancy exception handling and cvs code (which IMO
19 > shouldn't be in portage itself but repoman)
20 >
21 > Opinions about adding Manifest2 support to the next "minor" version
22 > (2.2.0 or 2.0.54 or 2.1.0 or ...)?
23
24 Might help if I actually attach the patch.
25
26 Marius
27
28 --
29 Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub
30
31 In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
32 Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.

Attachments

File name MIME type
new-style-manifest-generator-verifier.diff text/x-patch
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] inital Manifest2 support Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o>