| 1 |
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 13:42:49 +0100 |
| 2 |
George Shapovalov <george@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Ok, found it. |
| 5 |
> Thanks Marius! (for the debug hint) |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> It was indeed forcing gnat-gcc-4.1.1 by asis-gcc-4.1.1 which has |
| 8 |
> =dev-lang/gnat-4.1.1 (this is an "extension" to compiler and has to |
| 9 |
> match it 1 for 1, forgot to bump that one :(). |
| 10 |
> However, shouldn't --tree have reported the relevant package as |
| 11 |
> requiring this downgrade instead of some other, pretty much arbitrary |
| 12 |
> (from dependants of gnat-gcc)? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
In an ideal world: yes, but portage is far from being ideal (I won't |
| 15 |
pretend to know the internals of the dep resolver, so can't give a good |
| 16 |
explanation for this behavior). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Marius |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
| 24 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
Archives