| 1 |
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 19:52, Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:32:26 +0900 |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Tuesday 18 October 2005 16:49, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48531 |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > This simple patch automatically bumps portage to the top of the |
| 9 |
> > > merge list. I've always wanted this feature and it is a dependency |
| 10 |
> > > of bug 108262. Feedback please. :) |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > No good. ;) |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > What if portage's dependencies aren't satisfied? Something like the |
| 15 |
> > below (possibly combined with the pprovided stuff) would be better... |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Hmm, how would that work with virtual/portage != sys-apps/portage? |
| 18 |
> (rhetoric question) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
That's where the "something like" comes into it. What do you expect for less |
| 21 |
than one minute's work? (rhetoric question) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Jason Stubbs |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives