Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: "W. Trevor King" <wking@×××××××.us>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Initial fetch() refactoring
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 20:58:07
Message-Id: 20140119205802.GE19935@odin.tremily.us
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Initial fetch() refactoring by Sebastian Luther
1 On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 09:05:41PM +0100, Sebastian Luther wrote:
2 > Am 19.01.2014 04:07, schrieb W. Trevor King:
3 > > The patches aren't particularly well tested yet. I ran the test
4 > > suite and got some errors, but they seemed to be related to my
5 > > non-root invocation, and not due to these changes themselves. I
6 > > thought I'd post my work so far, before digging deeper into the
7 > > test suite.
8 >
9 > The tests can be run as non-root user. Make sure all the files in
10 > the git repo are +rw for that user.
11
12 Ok. I'll go back and check the results on master so I can compare.
13
14 > You should check the result using pyflakes.
15
16 Thanks. This picked up a few errors in the third patch. I'll post v2
17 shortly.
18
19 > Do you have these patches in the publicly accessible git repo?
20
21 I do now:
22
23 git://tremily.us/portage.git fetch-refactor
24
25 Cheers,
26 Trevor
27
28 --
29 This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
30 For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Initial fetch() refactoring "W. Trevor King" <wking@×××××××.us>