Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Move PORTAGE_INST_UID and PORTAGE_INST_GID to make.globals?
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 04:02:39
Message-Id: 200603111301.31501.jstubbs@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Move PORTAGE_INST_UID and PORTAGE_INST_GID to make.globals? by Kito
1 On Saturday 11 March 2006 06:48, Kito wrote:
2 >
3 > On Mar 10, 2006, at 4:26 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
4 >
5 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
6 > > Hash: SHA1
7 > >
8 > > Hello,
9 > >
10 > > What do people think about moving PORTAGE_INST_UID and
11 > > PORTAGE_INST_GID to make.globals?
12 >
13 > Would the profiles not be a more logical place to set these? If not,
14 > can we twist the logic to make it so? :p
15
16 The profiles would be able to override it. In the case of non-incrementals
17 the first definition found is the winner in the order of:
18
19 env -> make.conf -> make.defaults (profile) -> make.globals
20
21 --
22 Jason Stubbs
23 --
24 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies