Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Chris White <chris.chriswhite@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Porage API Documentation Proposal
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 06:02:05
Message-Id: 25fffe5a0607162234g4b43e220x365ba77e611143b1@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-portage-dev] Porage API Documentation Proposal by Chris White
1 Here's round 3. I've striped out the known issues, since everyone know nows
2 them. Replaced that missing link, and clarified on the "give an example"
3 bit.
4
5 On 7/17/06, Chris White <chris.chriswhite@×××××.com> wrote:
6 >
7 > Hi all,
8 >
9 > I had a discussion yesterday with the folks and #gentoo-portage regarding
10 > API documentation using epydoc and inline custom doc strings. Attached is a
11 > proposal of what I believe encompasses a majority of the discussion.
12 > Suggestions, comments, etc. are welcome. My standard gentoo account was
13 > doing weird things with mailing list subscriptions, so I'll be using my
14 > gmail account instead.
15 >
16 > Chris White
17 >
18 >

Attachments

File name MIME type
portage_documentation_proposal.txt text/plain

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Porage API Documentation Proposal Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>