1 |
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 11:05 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: |
2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Markus Duft wrote: |
6 |
> >> cool thanks :) so this patch makes portage merge in the order given on |
7 |
> >> the command line? this means it's the users fault if packages are in the |
8 |
> >> wrong order? |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Right. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> >> shouldn't portage do the same thing as with --nodeps, |
13 |
> >> except that it doesn't add new packages to the merge list? don't get me |
14 |
> >> wrong - i'm quite happy with beeing responsible for the order, i just |
15 |
> >> imageined passing (to stay with the same example) "--nodeps texinfo |
16 |
> >> help2man" which should reorder to help2man beeing before texinfo, i |
17 |
> >> would guess... thoughts? |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Well, what you are describing is something different from what |
20 |
> - --nodeps is supposed to mean. The intention for --nodeps is to not |
21 |
> account for any dependencies whatsoever. We can add a new option if |
22 |
> you need some different behavior. |
23 |
|
24 |
hm, ok. nah i don't need it, just wanted to know ;) |
25 |
|
26 |
Cheers, Markus |
27 |
|
28 |
> - -- |
29 |
> Thanks, |
30 |
> Zac |
31 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
32 |
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) |
33 |
> |
34 |
> iEYEARECAAYFAknsuVgACgkQ/ejvha5XGaO9HQCg3zIhUqMrL2pffqft/kOQdrLu |
35 |
> z8gAoJ+ZGkWRoQ19mRnc4WTlZ0hbMNmf |
36 |
> =STIm |
37 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
38 |
> |