| 1 |
On Wednesday 26 October 2005 23:56, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> I've attached a quickly thrown together patch for it, which works here, but |
| 3 |
> we really need to get this whole thing down pat. Perhaps usage of doebuild |
| 4 |
> without specifying tree should be deprecated and the code audited for any |
| 5 |
> usage without it? Making tree a keyword parameter will break too many |
| 6 |
> external things so that's not really an option... |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Updated patch; I missed a call to merge(). I really don't like this patch |
| 9 |
though because it touches way too much stuff. Anybody have any ideas for a |
| 10 |
better way of doing it? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-- |
| 13 |
Jason Stubbs |
Archives