| 1 |
On 25 May 2012 04:18, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
>> If there is no such policy, and a forced text-wrap at 80 characters is |
| 3 |
>> not needed, I would love for that setting to be removed. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Hmm, http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/file-format/index.html#indenting-and-whitespace |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
does sort of imply a "keep it under 80 chars where possible", but vims |
| 8 |
wrap settings don't really see it like that, vim is more "80 |
| 9 |
characters, if you can't get it under that, WRAP" . |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/variables/index.html#required-variables |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Indicates "less than 80", but 79 characters + 14 for 'DESCRIPTION=""' |
| 14 |
= 93 so if you're pushing the description limitation, vim will try |
| 15 |
wrapping each and every time you type a new letter. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
And repoman doesn't even warn till you hit a 100 character description |
| 18 |
( col 114 ) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
So is there something that specifies this somewhere, or does that |
| 21 |
required-variables and indenting-and-whitespace section need to be |
| 22 |
made updated and made more clear, that |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Description can be up to 100 ( not 80 ) and that the text-width is |
| 25 |
merely a suggestion, not any sort of |
| 26 |
defacto-but-hard-to-find-documented standard? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Kent |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
perl -e "print substr( \"edrgmaM SPA NOcomil.ic\\@tfrken\", \$_ * 3, |
| 32 |
3 ) for ( 9,8,0,7,1,6,5,4,3,2 );" |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
http://kent-fredric.fox.geek.nz |
Archives