| 1 |
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 04:50:37PM -0800, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 2 |
> Yo. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> New one from the looks of it- someone who has time (say, person who |
| 5 |
> commited it), please iron out the portage.dep_opconvert and |
| 6 |
> portage_dep.dep_opconvert. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Naming sucks at the very least, but they look to be a candidate for |
| 9 |
> refactoring/elimination. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Addendum to this, bug 115983 is a direct result of this- the result is |
| 12 |
|| (a b) , masking of a isn't properly realized. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Might be overkill, but after yet another flip through that code, |
| 15 |
I'm wondering why we haven't gutted that crap. Thoughts? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Yes, a refactoring will take a bit of time, and will probably |
| 18 |
introduce a bug or two, but the code that's there *really* is pretty |
| 19 |
damn groddy. :) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> ~harring |
Archives