1 |
Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> posted |
2 |
200702171009.35968.vapier@g.o, excerpted below, on Sat, 17 Feb |
3 |
2007 10:09:35 -0500: |
4 |
|
5 |
>> the old vuln. lib still will hang around as long as anything refs it. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> of course and this is the desired behavior ... people need to run |
8 |
> revdep-rebuild, there's no two ways about it |
9 |
|
10 |
Question: With the old library still around, will revdep-rebuild even try |
11 |
to rebuild anything linked against it? Maybe I'm wrong, but I thought it |
12 |
would only rebuild when the library was actually missing. (There's also a |
13 |
hint of that in another comment, but maybe I'm reading that wrong as well.) |
14 |
|
15 |
(Yes, I know the sig delimiter below is bugged. Bugged pan ATM.) |
16 |
-- |
17 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
18 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
19 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |