1 |
On 05/28/12 at 12:49AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: |
2 |
> On 05/27/2012 03:27 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
3 |
> > I have seen today a fixed bug that was only reproducible for people |
4 |
> > (like me) running without userpriv (but maintainer didn't found it |
5 |
> > before commiting because he was running with this feature enabled), I |
6 |
> > have also seen some packages skipping tests when not using userpriv. I |
7 |
> > am unsure then, why default is still to not use userpriv? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I think it's not enabled by default just because there's always risk |
10 |
> involved in changing the defaults. I've been using it for years and I |
11 |
> don't remember experiencing any problems because of it. |
12 |
> |
13 |
|
14 |
Same here. |
15 |
|
16 |
> > I haven't |
17 |
> > found important bugs opened pointing regressions but, since it's still |
18 |
> > disabled by default, I am still running in the old way instead of using |
19 |
> > "userpriv usersandbox" :/ |
20 |
> |
21 |
> I plan to send an email to the gentoo-dev mailing list, to ask if there |
22 |
> are any objections to having FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" enabled by |
23 |
> default. |
24 |
|
25 |
+1 |
26 |
|
27 |
> -- |
28 |
> Thanks, |
29 |
> Zac |
30 |
> |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Regards, |
34 |
Christian Ruppert |
35 |
Gentoo Linux developer, Bugzilla administrator and Infrastructure member |
36 |
Fingerprint: EEB1 C341 7C84 B274 6C59 F243 5EAB 0C62 B427 ABC8 |