Archives
Archives
| From: | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Recommendation about faster (not smaller) filesystem and blocksize combination for portage tree | ||
| Date: | Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:32:35 | ||
| Message-Id: | pan.2009.04.17.07.32.11@cox.net | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Recommendation about faster (not smaller) filesystem and blocksize combination for portage tree by Pacho Ramos |
||
| 1 | Pacho Ramos <pacho@××××××××××××××××××××××××.es> posted |
| 2 | 1239914420.18698.0.camel@localhost, excerpted below, on Thu, 16 Apr 2009 |
| 3 | 22:40:20 +0200: |
| 4 | |
| 5 | > Thanks, finally seems that, in my case, reiserfs with nolog,noatime |
| 6 | > works really fast and with a smaller size (thanks to "tail") :-D |
| 7 | |
| 8 | =:^) |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 12 | "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 13 | and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |