| 1 |
On Friday 22 July 2005 02:17, Brian D. Harring wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:13:34PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
> > diff -uNr portage-2.0.51.22-r2/bin/ebuild.sh portage-patched/bin/ebuild.sh |
| 4 |
> > --- portage-2.0.51.22-r2/bin/ebuild.sh 2005-07-19 19:38:32.949904000 +0900 |
| 5 |
> > +++ portage-patched/bin/ebuild.sh 2005-07-21 23:03:58.429898000 +0900 |
| 6 |
> > @@ -85,6 +85,11 @@ |
| 7 |
> > export SANDBOX_PREDICT="$SANDBOX_PREDICT:$1" |
| 8 |
> > } |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > +lchown() |
| 11 |
> > +{ 0; } |
| 12 |
> > + |
| 13 |
> > +lchgrp() |
| 14 |
> > +{ 0; } |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Default being negation of funcs, and forcing profiles to override it? |
| 17 |
> Why not reverse it, a default func that works, with profiles |
| 18 |
> overriding if/when it doesn't work? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I don't really like the idea of adding yet another >& /dev/null. With a GNU |
| 21 |
userland, it would be something like: |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
lchown() |
| 24 |
{ chown -h $* } |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
If the many errors that will occur when the userland's chown doesn't support |
| 27 |
this flag are okay, putting in working defaults are fine. The main reasons I |
| 28 |
went with no-ops are that symlink ownership is purely cosmetic (afaik) and |
| 29 |
to try to keep userland specific stuff out. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Jason Stubbs |
Archives