| 1 |
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:52:13 -0600 |
| 2 |
Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 09:19:55AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Sunday 13 November 2005 04:00, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > *cough* that's that funky _p1 you're using there? :) |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > patchlevel... I think it gives a stronger impression that 2.0.53 is |
| 9 |
> > distinct from 2.0.54. Is distinct the right word? I mean that it |
| 10 |
> > kind of shows that 2.0.53 is done but there was something that |
| 11 |
> > needed to be fixed quickly. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> 2.0.53.1 vs 2.0.53_p1 vs 2.0.53.p1 ... either of the three indicates |
| 14 |
> 2.0.53 had minor fix tagged onto the base 2.0.53 release... |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Except that the third one isn't valid syntax. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Marius |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
| 24 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives