Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Greg Turner <gmt@×××××.us>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] musings on config.{sub,guess} replacement living in econf (was: [PATCH] econf: update configure/config.{sub,guess} atomically to avoid races)
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 02:36:10
Message-Id: CA+VB3NSs-r9FD4JFU_vNERnRHexVJtMRFe8WLci4umNYbs-0FQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] musings on config.{sub,guess} replacement living in econf (was: [PATCH] econf: update configure/config.{sub,guess} atomically to avoid races) by Mike Frysinger
1 On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote:
2 >> In short... moving the config.{sub,guess} replacement code (but
3 >> probably not the shebang patching for reasons of expedience) to some
4 >> post-src_prepare place would probably be more elegant and pretty easy
5 >> to do.
6 >
7 > that discussion should happen on gentoo-dev in conjunction with PMS. or file a
8 > bug if there isn't one already.
9
10 Good point, hadn't even thought that far ahead... In truth I'll
11 probably procrastinate and/or not bother until my queue of
12 half-realized Gentoo contributions can be shortened a bit -- I doubt
13 anybody will die of inelegance in the meanwhile :)
14
15 -gmt