Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] per-package use.mask (bug 96368)
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 05:41:21
Message-Id: 44D6D207.5010304@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] per-package use.mask (bug 96368) by Brian Harring
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Brian Harring wrote:
5 > On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 02:54:36AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
6 >> seems to me that we'd also have to implement use-dep matching in
7 >> order to correctly support use-dep syntax.
8 >
9 > If you were actually supporting use deps, yes. You're not
10 > however- package.use.mask is just a kludge in the (hopefully short)
11 > interim.
12
13 It doesn't make any sense to me to have use-deps syntax without support for use-deps matching. Sorry.
14
15 Zac
16 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
17 Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
18
19 iD8DBQFE1tIG/ejvha5XGaMRAmjCAKDU7guES8UhHKpcG43+ArEpLxu3fQCbBXn0
20 YlmPIQgPUO09mcdKqtkMJBY=
21 =jXcS
22 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
23 --
24 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] per-package use.mask (bug 96368) Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com>