| 1 |
Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 |
> Well, it's been the tree for 2 days now we'll surely get bug reports |
| 3 |
> as soon as people run into these hypothetical issues (though I |
| 4 |
> expect very few, if any regressions). I think the globals cleanup |
| 5 |
> is worth having in 2.1 because it makes the code more maintainable. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Ack. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> If you want to move back to a more stable revision, I'd suggest |
| 10 |
> 2.1_pre7 (before manifest2). I believe manifest2 introduced more |
| 11 |
> potential for regressions than the globals cleanup did. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I think we should really include Manifest2 in 2.1. So my personal favourite is |
| 14 |
pre10. I don't think Zac's cleanup will introduce many bugs, and if there are |
| 15 |
any, it should be pretty easy to fix them. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Kind Regards, |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Simon Stelling |
| 21 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Developer |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives