Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Porage API Documentation Proposal
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 20:19:16
Message-Id: 44BA9F10.2070507@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-portage-dev] Porage API Documentation Proposal by Chris White
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Chris White wrote:
5 > I had a discussion yesterday with the folks and #gentoo-portage
6 > regarding API documentation using epydoc and inline custom doc strings.
7 > Attached is a proposal of what I believe encompasses a majority of the
8 > discussion. Suggestions, comments, etc. are welcome.
9
10 Thanks for working on this proposal. The epytext markup seems nice and I think we should go ahead and use it if there is no superior alternative markup format for python docstrings.
11
12 Zac
13 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
14 Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux)
15
16 iD8DBQFEup8P/ejvha5XGaMRAub8AJ4kDiXoGkmQUJBUFS8NAj5D2Mt/tQCfXaeY
17 zACvQ/7wvU86vcA+hzbWOAY=
18 =dN2q
19 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
20 --
21 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list