Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage-ng concurse entry Was: Updated Portage project page

[Jeff Smelser]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 07 December 2003 01:59 pm, Philippe Lafoucrière wrote:
> If you use a backend db using sqllite, you just have 1 file representing
> your DB, and so, your portage tree. Then you can send this file through
> rsync. Another DB file should be used to manage installed package. an
> emerge -UDp world should just look in the installed DB for packages, and
> then compare status in portage db. Maybe an idea...

Yes. but people like me would have a problem with that. So I would hope there 
will be more of a generic routine on DB calls.. I don't care if I download a 
sqlite db, but I don't want 4 copies either.. I would want a central db, 
mysql such as, and have one copy of the portage db, and another table of 
installed packages.. The table could be smart enough to know the machine 
name, or separate tables wouldn't bother me much either.

Unless, I heard a rumor there was going to be more of a client/server version, 
so maybe it can be solved that way?

I only keep one copy of /usr/portage now due to disk space.  I refuse to tie 
up that much disk space when I can centralize it.

- -- 
               Speak softly and carry a cellular phone.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/04mXld4MRA3gEwYRAnvQAKDpXn7Oo7Gy8hSAKt125mOzTYXyzQCfS1Vu
Z+HDFOD1Gj3LzuDR0tp5djQ=
=pAur
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list