| 1 |
On 05/14/2012 01:10 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 14 May 2012 15:08:32 Zac Medico wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Actually, the inode_var_name thing will not work unless it's all in |
| 4 |
>> one process. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> hmm, true, but that's the level we currently parallelize at, so it's fine. we |
| 7 |
> do one subprocess per ELF and that includes the strip/splitdebug/splitsources. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> parallelizing more than on a per-ELF basis will require much finer grained |
| 10 |
> queues which, while possible, would make the file much harder to hack on and |
| 11 |
> extend. and i'm not sure we'd see that much of a gain. |
| 12 |
> -mike |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
The thing is, in the case of hardlinks, we're parallelizing multiple |
| 15 |
times on the *same* elf. Anyway, I've fixed it by using a directory full |
| 16 |
of hardlinks, in these commits: |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=ad944275b88a50d2a1f694826b127cceb9221e78 |
| 19 |
http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=9ed00a9e70a3705164a5349145ff467e5c40ddfd |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Thanks, |
| 22 |
Zac |
Archives