Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: David James <davidjames@××××××.com>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Add a test case for --newuse, --changed-use, and --binpkg-respect-use.
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:04:20
Message-Id: CAGNm6ewi3+oqM6OyQs=H-WHM4h0D4QrAv4L5_3FMCMSRTLCa5A@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Add a test case for --newuse, --changed-use, and --binpkg-respect-use. by Brian Dolbec
1 On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> wrote:
2
3 > On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:14:26 -0800
4 > David James <davidjames@××××××.com> wrote:
5 >
6 > > Change-Id: I201e468c6e7cda6aa961371ad9ddc10cfab04bc7
7 > > ---
8 > > pym/portage/tests/resolver/test_useflags.py | 78
9 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
10 > > 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)
11 > > create mode 100644 pym/portage/tests/resolver/test_useflags.py
12 > >
13 > >
14 >
15 > Was there a difference in this posting to the one last Thursday?
16 >
17 > If not a simple bump reminder was all that should have been done.
18 >
19 > If it is different, they you should have created the patch with the
20 > -v 2 format-patch option. And summarized the changes.
21 >
22 > Sebastian I believe, has had the most experience with the tests, so I
23 > will leave the review up to him, Mike.
24
25
26 It's the same patch -- I just accidentally sent it twice. So consider this
27 a bump, then.

Replies