1 |
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:14:26 -0800 |
4 |
> David James <davidjames@××××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > Change-Id: I201e468c6e7cda6aa961371ad9ddc10cfab04bc7 |
7 |
> > --- |
8 |
> > pym/portage/tests/resolver/test_useflags.py | 78 |
9 |
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ |
10 |
> > 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+) |
11 |
> > create mode 100644 pym/portage/tests/resolver/test_useflags.py |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Was there a difference in this posting to the one last Thursday? |
16 |
> |
17 |
> If not a simple bump reminder was all that should have been done. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> If it is different, they you should have created the patch with the |
20 |
> -v 2 format-patch option. And summarized the changes. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Sebastian I believe, has had the most experience with the tests, so I |
23 |
> will leave the review up to him, Mike. |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
It's the same patch -- I just accidentally sent it twice. So consider this |
27 |
a bump, then. |