Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@×××××××××.se>
To: "gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o" <gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] repos.conf location w.r.t PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT
Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 13:47:07
Message-Id: 1431179221.27859.260.camel@transmode.se
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] repos.conf location w.r.t PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT by Zac Medico
1 On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 11:32 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
2 > On 05/07/2015 11:43 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
3 > > On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 14:09 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
4 > > > On 05/07/2015 03:51 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
5 > > > > On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 22:45 +0000, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
6 > > > > > On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 15:16 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
7 > > > > > > On 05/06/15 14:57, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
8 > > > > > > > On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 14:36 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
9 > > > > > > > > On 05/06/15 14:30, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
10 > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 13:30 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
11 > > > > > > > > > > On 05/06/15 13:22, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
12 > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 12:54 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
13 > > > > > > > > > > > > On 05/06/15 12:41, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
14 > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 19:13 +0000, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
15 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 11:37 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
16 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 05/06/15 09:54, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
17 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am trying to rebuild an old cross sysroot and I got problems.
18 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I cannot make emerge to select my old ebuilds in an overlay over those
19 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in /usr/portage.
20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
21 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What new is since last time I did this is /etc/portage/repos.conf/
22 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I suspect emerge always reads /etc/portage/repos.conf/ no matter
23 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what I set PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT / ROOT to ?
24 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
25 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jocke
26 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
27 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
28 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It instantiates 2 config instances, one using /etc/portage/repos.conf
29 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (for build time DEPEND) and another one using
30 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > $PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT/etc/portage/repos.conf (for run time {P,R}DEPEND).
31 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can see that it's joined with PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT in the
32 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > load_repository_config function:
33 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
34 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/tree/pym/portage/repository/config.py
35 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ?id=
36 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 0f19
37 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 11
38 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 13cc
39 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cd04
40 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 9e11
41 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fdbe
42 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 73
43 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 493eb1efbf4bf89e#n971
44 > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
45 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I see, doesn't this prevent exactly what I want to do?
46 > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
47 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can't see why this should be needed, it only creates a mess, another example:
48 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I tried to specify exact version of my old binutils and while that worked,
49 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > portage
50 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wanted
51 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to pull in a newer binutils-config from the hosts master gentoo repo and
52 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thus the build failed.
53 > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
54 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If a someone really wants this behaviour, he can just add the hosts master repo
55 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in his PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT IMHO
56 > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
57 > > > > > > > > > > > >
58 > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe emerge --root-deps=rdeps is what you are looking for. This will
59 > > > > > > > > > > > > cause it to ignore DEPEND.
60 > > > > > > > > > > >
61 > > > > > > > > > > > That is not the same is it? if I "emerge ncurses" it will build ncurses but still
62 > > > > > > > > > > > take the ebuild from the hosts master since it is newer version.
63 > > > > > > > > > > >
64 > > > > > > > > > > > I realize now that I can change what repos are searched by using
65 > > > > > > > > > > > PORTAGE_REPOSITORIES=/my/own/repos.conf/
66 > > > > > > > > > > > but I still find the default behaviour very confusing and I don't see that it is useful.
67 > > > > > > > > > >
68 > > > > > > > > > > The idea is that you have separate repositories configured for each
69 > > > > > > > > > > ROOT. If it's satisfying a build-time DEPEND that will be installed into
70 > > > > > > > > > > ROOT=/, then it's supposed to use the repositories configured for ROOT=/.
71 > > > > > > > > >
72 > > > > > > > > > I see, but in my case I only install into my sysroot so I don't want this behaviour.
73 > > > > > > > >
74 > > > > > > > > So, why don't you use the --root-deps option?
75 > > > > > > >
76 > > > > > > > Just did(and --root-deps=rdeps too) and it didn't work, still wants to use
77 > > > > > > > my newer hosts pkgs. :(
78 > > > > > >
79 > > > > > > It shouldn't do that. It sounds like maybe the [gentoo] config
80 > > > > > > from/usr/share/portage/config/repos.conf is the source of your problems,
81 > > > > > > since you $PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT config will always inherit that. Would
82 > > > > > > that be consistent with your observations?
83 > > > > >
84 > > > > > Moving that file out of the way changed things, now I got I profile error:
85 > > > > > !!! Unable to parse profile: '/etc/portage/make.profile'
86 > > > > > !!! ParseError: Parent 'gentoo:default/linux/amd64/13.0' not found:
87 > > > > > '/var/lib/layman/transmode/profiles/gentoo64-server/parent'
88 > > > > > !!! Your current profile is invalid. If you have just changed your profile
89 > > > > > !!! configuration, you should revert back to the previous configuration.
90 > > > > > !!! Allowed actions are limited to --help, --info, --search, --sync, and
91 > > > > > !!! --version.
92 > > > > >
93 > > > > > Which I think is a problem in my cross env.
94 > > > >
95 > > > > No, this is not it. Portage just bails when reading the host profile which it should not.
96 > > > >
97 > > > > Note: defining
98 > > > > PORTAGE_REPOSITORIES=/my/own/repos.conf
99 > > > > gives the same error.
100 > > > >
101 > > >
102 > > > According to the error message, your transmode profile inherits a gentoo
103 > > > profile, so you need the gentoo repository (at least the relevant profile).
104 > >
105 > > I have a my own profile in PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT which does not
106 > > reference the host /etc/portage/make.profile at all so I think
107 > > portage is using the wrong profile.
108 >
109 > When using ROOT=/foo, it always instantiates 2 profiles, and it uses one
110 > profile for ROOT=/foo and the other profile for ROOT=/.
111
112 This makes sense when just using ROOT, not when cross compiling.
113 If I cross build (or use PORTAGE_REPOSITORIES ?) I don't think it makes
114 sense to add the hosts profile as it has little to nothing to
115 do with my cross target.
116 How would a cross target use the hosts profile sensibly?
117
118 >
119 > > Futhermore, it does not understand the host profile, probably
120 > > because my own PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT don't have profile-formats = portage-2
121 >
122 > You're saying this beciase of the above ParseError? I think maybe what
123 > you want to do keep the default /usr/share/portage/config/repos.conf and
124 > mask */*::gentoo in $PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT/etc/portage/package.mask.
125
126 That is what I am doing now, but that still includes the hosts profile I think ?
127
128 Jocke

Replies