| 1 |
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 02:12:59PM -0800, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 2 |
> Index: pym/portage.py |
| 3 |
> =================================================================== |
| 4 |
> --- pym/portage.py (revision 2472) |
| 5 |
> +++ pym/portage.py (working copy) |
| 6 |
> @@ -2791,6 +2791,29 @@ |
| 7 |
> not fetch(fetchme, mysettings, listonly=listonly, fetchonly=fetchonly): |
| 8 |
> return 1 |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> + # inefficient. improve this logic via making actionmap easily searchable to see if we're in the chain of what |
| 11 |
> + # will be executed, either that or forced N doebuild calls instead of a single set of phase calls. |
| 12 |
> + if mydo not in ("setup", "clean", "postinst", "preinst", "prerm") or "noauto" in features: |
| 13 |
Bleh, pardon, old patch, that actually should be |
| 14 |
if mydo not in ("setup", "clean", "postinst", "preinst", "prerm") and (mydo == "unpack" or "noauto" not in features): |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Time for caffeine /me thinks... |
| 17 |
~harring |
Archives