| 1 |
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> El sáb, 22-09-2012 a las 13:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger escribió: |
| 3 |
>> On Friday 21 September 2012 15:08:20 Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 4 |
>> > In that one, we try to use the following: |
| 5 |
>> > has vala ${IUSE//+/} && ! use vala && return 0 |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> inherit eutils |
| 8 |
>> use_if_iuse vala |
| 9 |
>> -mike |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I am aware of that one also, but Ciaran also wants to forbid it for the |
| 12 |
> same reason :S |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Well I assume Ciaran wants to forbid it because he is attempting to |
| 15 |
write a PMS compliant PM; but in order to use these ebuilds properly |
| 16 |
he has to emulate the unspecified behavior that the ebuilds rely on |
| 17 |
upon. His claim is that the council is supposed to forbid this |
| 18 |
behavior (presumably to make his job less horrible) but I don't see |
| 19 |
them beating down your door to change it (and the behavior is not |
| 20 |
new.) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-A |
Archives