Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 1/2] Add FEATURES=binpkg-multi-instance (bug 150031)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 19:59:12
Message-Id: 54E39D8C.9050704@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 1/2] Add FEATURES=binpkg-multi-instance (bug 150031) by Brian Dolbec
1 On 02/17/2015 11:56 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
2 > On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 11:26:27 -0800
3 > Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote:
4 >
5 >> On 02/17/2015 10:42 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
6 >>>
7 >>> overall, there is no way I know the code well enough to know if you
8 >>> screwed up. But the code looks decent, so...
9 >>>
10 >>> My only questions are:
11 >>>
12 >>> pym/portage/dbapi/bintree.py:
13 >>>
14 >>> You removed several functions from the binarytree class and
15 >>> essentially reduced prevent_collision to a warning message. Can
16 >>> you briefly say why they are not needed please.
17 >>
18 >> Okay, I'll include this info in an updated patch:
19 >>
20 >
21 > Actually, I think this one patch could be split into a few logical
22 > ones. Tag them
23 >
24 > binpkg-multi-instance 1 of...
25 >
26 > in the commit message so it is clear they
27 > belong together. That way the commit messages can more clearly be
28 > relevant to the file(s) changed.
29 >
30 > The commit message is already a short story in length ;) before adding
31 > these new explanations.
32
33 Okay, will do.
34 --
35 Thanks,
36 Zac