| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:38:48 -0800 |
| 6 |
> Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>> Since portage-2.2 isn't quite ready yet due to ongoing work in |
| 9 |
>> package sets and preserve-libs, and I don't want ongoing work to |
| 10 |
>> hold back other features that are stable, I'm planning to split a |
| 11 |
>> 2.1.6 branch from trunk. This branch will have package sets and |
| 12 |
>> preserve-libs support disabled. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Disabled as in FEATURES="-preserve-libs" and an almost empty |
| 15 |
> sets.conf, or disabled as in "remove all traces from the code"? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I think the relevant APIs should be made private so that people |
| 18 |
won't write code that relies on them, and things like sets.conf and |
| 19 |
/var/lib/portage/world_sets should be completely disabled so that |
| 20 |
people won't rely on them either. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
- -- |
| 23 |
Thanks, |
| 24 |
Zac |
| 25 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 26 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkkVJ6sACgkQ/ejvha5XGaOZqQCffLU2qPkOfTNEzvXtKw7l4+v6 |
| 29 |
XVAAoL8hP/xVPk4n9D1/qkoDdktyhutO |
| 30 |
=WI9Q |
| 31 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives